Cross Process Innovations

Section 2. General Issues in Cross Process Study

Many processes such as plastic flow, mechanical abrasion, heating, melting, evaporation, and dissolution, and others, change both physical/chemical conditions of the processes and the workpiece material properties. The performance characteristics of the cross processes must be considerably different from those that are characteristic for the “component” processes, when performed separately. For example, productivity of electro discharge electrochemical machining (EDCM), which consists of making use of electrical discharges in electrolyte for metal removal, is 5 to 50 times greater than the productivity using individual processes of ECM or EDM [2, 3].

 

There are generally two categories of Cross Machining Processes:

  1. Processes in which all constituent processes are directly involved in the material removal, and
  2. Processes in which only one of the participating processes directly removes the material while the others only assist in removal by changing the conditions of machining in a “positive” direction from the point of view of improving capabilities of machining.

In both of these categories, thermal, chemical, electro-chemical, photon-chemical, and mechanical interactions with the target may occur. The general issues in cross pross study is to integrate different processes, making use of their individual advantages while avert their adverse effects. The first step is to understand the interactions involved in various machining processes. To develop a practical process for industry, the overall feasibility should also be evaluated. Normally the cross process is more complex than the individual processes. The benefits should be big enough for the industry to accept it as a feasible solution to their problems. The effects of various interactions in the machining processes are discussed below. The feasibility problems will be discussed in individual processes.

Thermal Interactions

Laser beam treatment (LBT), welding (LBW) and machining (LBM), electron beam machining(EBM), electrical discharge machining (EDM), and plasma beam machining (PBM) are thermal processes where the material is removed through phase changes, either by melting or vaporization. Many secondary phenomena relating to surface quality, such as micro-cracking, formation of heat-affected zone and formation of striations, may also be related to the thermal effects of the above processes. 

If the distribution of the power density of a heat source on a treated surface as result of energy source is known, the temperature field can be determined and finally it is possible to estimate the critical power density needed to reach a given temperature at a given point or in a given point in a given volume of the material in a given time interval tI (pulse duration). For instance, the critical power density required to reach on the surface of the melting temperature Tm or the boiling temperature Tb under normal pressure at the workpiece surface can be determined [4]. 

To estimate the power density ( ) needed to obtain the temperature Tm on the surface, the one-dimensional model of heating of semi-infinite body by a heat source with the intensity constant in time can be used [4]: 

                                                   (1)

where a and l are thermal diffusivity and conductivity respectively. 

The critical value of heat power density ( ), which leads to evaporation, can be estimated from the following equation [4]: 

(2)

where r is the density of workpiece material

 

The time required to reach a given temperature on the surface of the material, for example, to boiling point Tb, increases with an increasing boiling temperature, heat conduction l, and specific heat of the material C, and decreases with increasing heat power density q. To estimate the value of , we can use the expression obtained from the one-dimensional model of heating of a semi-infinite solid:

                                                           (3)

The above expressions (1-3) can be used to estimate the characteristics of heat sources for removal processes in EDM, LBM, EBM and PBM.
 
Fig. 1 Temperature dependence of the yield strength Rp0.2 and ultimate tensile strength Rm of two Ni-base superalloys [5]

The resistance of workpiece material to mechanical removal process by cutting edge or abrasives (random oriented edges) depend on the high temperature (below melting point) generated at the machining zone. It is known that stress-strain curves and the flow and fracture properties derived from the tension test strongly depend on the temperature at which the test is conducted. In general, the strength decreases and ductility increases as the temperature is increased. For example, the temperature dependence of the strength for heat resistant Ni-base superalloys is illustrated Figure 1 [5]. Therefore, it is quite logical to assume that high temperatures reduce the cutting forces and the energy consumption, and increase the machinability of workpiece material by mechanical removing processes. Some cross processes has been developed according to this idea, such as laser assisted ECM (Section 3) and laser or plasma assisted machining of ceramics (Section 5).

In chemical or electrochemical interactions, an increase in temperature leads to acceleration of kinetic reactions on heated surfaces, such as anodic dissolution or cathodic deposition. The effect of temperature on the rate of these processes (i.e. on current density iL, which determines the rate of dissolution/deposition) is described by following Arrhenius equation:

(4)

where , To, and Ts are initial and final (after heating) surface temperatures respectively, is the increment in temperature, io is current density without heating i.e. at  = 0, E0 is the activation energy, and R is the gas constant. The increase in current density (rate of processes) as the result of thermal assistance is shown in Figure 2 [6].
 
 
Fig. 2 Effect of temperature on the current density of ECM electrode [6]

The value of iL/i0 at a temperature increase of D= 70, i.e., near the boiling point of the electrolyte, depends on the workpiece material. For steel, copper, etc, the value of iL/i0 changes in a range from 30 to 570!  Therefore, local heating by laser beam can be used to assist the chemical or electrochemical removal/deposition processes.

Chemical and Electro-chemical Interactions

Chemical milling (CM), etching (E), electrochemical machining (ECM), pulse electrochemical machining (PECM), electropolishig (EP) are shaping and finishing processes based on the dissolution of materials.

 

Chemical milling is the selective and controlled metal removal by chemical action. It is especially useful for removing metals from sheet components to reduce weight, and it can be employed after parts have been formed and heat-treated. Any metal that can be chemically dissolved in solution can be chemically milled.

 

Electrochemical shaping and finishing is based on controlled anodic electrochemical dissolution process of the workpiece (anode) with a cathode tool in an electrolytic cell. Being a non-mechanical metal removal process, ECM is capable of machining any electrically conductive materials with high stock removal rates regardless of their mechanical properties, such as hardness, elasticity and brittleness. Shaping by electrochemical dissolution is described by the distribution of the dissolution velocity, Vn, on the anode-workpiece surface,

                                                                                                (5)
where KV is the electrochemical machinabilty coefficient, which is defined as the volume of material dissolved per unit electrical charge, and ia is the current density on anode-workpiece surface. The assistance of other actions during electrochemical machining is determined by their effect on KV and ia, such as the effect of heating on electrochemical processes described by equation (4).

 

The interaction of chemical and electrochemical processes with other removal processes is mainly based on their influence on the physical properties of the workpiece surface layer and the working media. The effect of electrochemical and chemical processes contributes in changing the dislocation density in surface layer of the workpiece material. And due to the reduction in surface potential energy during dissolution, plastic deformation is easier and the level of work hardening is decreased. Fig. 3 illustrates the change of surface microhardness (HV) during anodic dissolution[7]. As seen in the figure, even with relatively low current densities, significant reduction in microhardness occurs. For example, in the case of 3H13 steel, surface microhardness reduces from 220 MPa at i = 0A/cm2 to 168 MPa at i = 1A/cm2.
 
Fig. 3 Effect of current density of anodic dissolution on the microhardness of machining surface (electrolyte: water solution of NaNO3 – 50 g/l, and NaNO2 – 10 g/l; material: Armco-curves 1, 3H13 steel-curve 2) [7]

 

Chemical and electrochemical action can influence the physical conditions in the machining zone. For example, generation of gas bubbles during electrochemical reaction is the major factor in electrical discharges in an electrolyte. Chemical and electrochemical actions may increase the radiation absorptivity of metals and thus decrease the radiation energy thresholds for melting and vaporization during laser action. There is good reason to combine these beneficial effects in different processes.

 

Mechanical Interactions  

Traditional cutting, grinding and abrasive finishing methods are based on mechanical interactions of the cutting edge with the workpiece materials. Mechanical interactions also play important roles in water jet machining and ulttrasonic machining. Freedom of movement can be added to the various machining processes which increase the flexibility of the porcesses. The mechanical assistance in the thermal and/or electrochemical removal processes is based on their influences on the properties of the workpiece and the working media.

Mechanical interactions can improve the working conditions in the anodic dissolution processdue to mechanical depassivation of the surface. By removing a thin layer of oxides and other compounds from the anode, the surface dissolution is intensified and the smoothness of the machined surface can be increased. Mechanical interactions can increase the machining rate but may leave substantial residual stresses which may be undesirable. While chemical processes can relieve the residual stresses. Thus it's attractive to combine these beneficial effects in one process. It has been found that as a result of mechanical depassivation, material removal rate by dissolution process (electro­chemical grinding) has been increased by 100-142% when grinding T15KG carbides, by 21-44% for H18N10T steel, and by 32-71% for Armco iron [7].

Significant effects of mechanical action can be generated by ultrasonic wave. The cavitation generated by ultrasonic vibration can enhance the EDM, ECM and LBM processes. In ultrasonically assisted EDM or LBM drilling, it is recognised that the role of the acoustic wave and cavitation is to improve the flushing and the material removal from the surface craters. These process condition improvements are significant for micro drilling and grooving.

 

Illustration of Cross Process Analysis

Abrasive EDM

The above brief description of major interactions shows the importantance of combining different machining methods based on different kind of interactions for enhancing the manufacturing capabilities. Figure 4 shows the major cross/hybrid machining processes under development such as:
    Abrasive Electrochemical Grinding AECG, Abrasive Electrochemical Honing - AECH, Electrochemical Arc Machining - ECAM, Electrochemical Discharge Machining - ECDM, Abrasive Electrical Discharge Grinding - AEDG, Abrasive Electrical Discharge Machining (Sinking) - AEDM, Magnetic Abrasive Finishing - MAF, Ultrasonic Machining with Electrochemical assistance - USMEC, Ultrasonic Assistance Electrical Discharge Machining - UAEDM, Turning with thermal assistance (hot machining) such as Laser Assistance Turning – LAT, and Plasma Assistance Turning-PAT, Laser assistance Electrochemical Machining LECM, Laser Assistance Etching - LAE, and Mechano-Chemical Polishing – MCP, etc.
Fig. 4 Scheme for combinations of machining methods, ED-electro dischage; LB--laser beam; EB--electron beam; PB--plasma beam; CH--chemical; EC--electro chemical; A--abrasive; T--turning; US--ultrasonic; F--flow.

 

An individual hybrid machining process can be presented by “process conditions scheme”(PCS), which is the diagram of condition features of machining and its conjugate (Figure 5). The base side of the conditions triangle (Figure 5) represents the kind of interactions such as Thermal (electron beam EB, plasma beam PB, laser beam LB and electrical discharges ED), Electrochemical EC and chemical CH, and Mechanical. Note that A denotes grinding and abrasive flow, C cutting (turning, milling, drilling etc), US ultrasonic wave, and F flow fluid action (high pressure water jet, low pressure suspension jet etc.). The left side of the triangle represents the set of energy carriers: Photons, Electrons, Ions, Plasma, Abrasives i.e. random oriented cutting particles, Cutting edges, and Fluid jet. The right side of the triangle consists of types of working media: Solid particles, Electrolyte, Fluid, Dielectric, and Gas[1].

Fig. 5 Process Conditions Scheme (PCS) for Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

 

In Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) main interaction is thermal by electrical discharges (ED), which leads to material removal by melting and evaporation (see the bold line connecting ED with “process circle”-EDM, in Figure 5). As we can see from left side, during the electrical discharges, energy accumulated in the pulse generator is transferred to the workpiece and to the tool electrode, by electrons and ions in the plasma channel (thin lines from electron and ions points to line Plasma-EDM). For all processes dielectric is used as working medium (line from dielectric point on right side of triangle to circle).

 

In hybrid processes based on EDM, for example, abrasive electrical discharge machining (AEDM), when free abrasive grains, such as silicon carbide powder, are added to the dielectric, the PCS and scheme of principle of AEDM are shown in Fig. 6.
 

 

Fig. 6 Diagram of principle and PCS of Abrasive Electrical Discharge Machining (AEDM)

The main thermal interaction (bold line) is assisted by abrasion-mechanical interaction (the line connecting A and the circle AEDM), now energy is carried by plasma and by abrasive grains. Working media consists dielectric and solid particles, as indicated by two lines connected from the right side of the triangle conditions with the circle. Mixing silicon powder into dielectric reduces electrical capacitance across the discharge gap by increasing the gap size. The result is higher dispersion of sparks and improvement in the discharge characteristics, especially in the machining of large workpieces.

Application of powder-mixed working media allows AEDM to obtain mirror finishing of complex shape and more uniform and crackless affected layer. Therefore, AEDM produces a die without the need of removing the affected layer, i.e. without polishing it, and therefore is being utilized for plastic molding and die-cast.

 

Total material removal rate in a hybrid machining process, which is the combination two removal processes A and B, can be expressed as:

                                                                       (6)

where is the material removal rate of process A with the assistance of B, and is the material removal rate of process B with the assistance of process A. Usually  > and  > , then the total removal rate of a hybrid method is usually higher than the sum of removal rate and  . In many hybrid machining processes, besides contributions from component processes, some additional contributions may also come from the interaction of the component process.

 

Electrical Discharge Machining with Ultrasonic Assistance (EDMUS)

In ultrasonically assisted EDM, it is recognised that the role of the acoustic wave and cavitation phenomena is to improve the flushing and material removal from the surface craters.These process conditions are significant for micro drilling and production of slots and grooves. The vibrating movement of the tool electrode or the workpiece, improves the slurry circulation and the pumping action by pushing the debris away and sucking new fresh dielectric, which provides ideal condition for discharges and gives higher removal rate.

 

Another beneficial effect that has been observed concerns structural modifications. The high frequency motion of the electrode and workpiece due to ultrasonic wave creates more turbulence and cavitation, and results in better ejection of the molten metal from craters. This increases the removal rate and less material recasts on the surface. Thus, structure modifications are minimized, less micro-cracks are observed, and fatigue life is increased [8]. The principle scheme for EDMUS is shown in Figure 7. Associating EDM and USM can lead to considerable improvements in the production of complex shape workpieces.


 

 

Fig. 7 Scheme and PCS of Electrical Discharge Machining with Ultrasonic Assistance (EDMUS)

References

 

[1] Rajurkar, K. P., Zhu, D. McGeough, J. A., Kozak, J., De Silva A.: New Developments in Electro-Chemical Machining. Annals Annals of the CIRP, 1999 vol.48/2,p.569-579.

[2] McGeough, J. A., Khayry, A. U., Munro, W.: Theoretical and experimental Investigation of the Relative Effects of Spark Erosion and electrochemical Dissolution in Electrochemical Arc Machining. Annals of the CIRP, 1983 vol.32/1,p.113-116.

[3] Isakova, R. B., Moroz, I.,I.: Electrochemical Discharge Machining. Proceedings Conf. On “ECHO-69”, Tula, 1969 pp.75-79.

[4]Rykalin, N., Uglov, A., Kokora, A.: Laser machining and Welding. 1975, Pergamon Press –Mir Publisher.

[5] Superallys-Sourse Book.1984,ed. M., J., Donachie American Society for Metals, Metals Park-Ohio.

 

[6] Kozak, J.: Laser Activation of Electrode Processes in Electrochemical Shaping. Transaction of the Scientific School on Nontraditional Machining, 1998,vol.4, pp.83-88.

 

[7] Kotlar, A. M., Szczerbak, M. V.: Experimental Investigations of Abrasive Electrochemical Grinding. Elektronnaja Obrabotka Materialov, 1974, Nr 4, pp.29-32.

 

[8] Kramer, D., Lebrun, B., Moisan, A.: Effects of Ultrasonic Vibrations on the Performances in EDM. Annals of the CIRP Vol. 38/1, 1989, pp. 199- 202